I’m interested in how Community Maps are shared and meet confidentiality, copyright and intellectual property obligations. Going for written consent results in only 10-20% of the community appearing on the map (unless you do exceptional coproduction), while the really useful stuff is unpublishable!

I’m putting some thoughts down at How-to-decide-what-to-publish-in-your-directory-of-community-assets.pdf (peterbates.org.uk). That document is just one day old, so it will be better soon, especially if you send your comments and suggestions to peter.bates@ndti.org.uk. What should we be saying on this? What should I read? Who should I talk to?

I'm grateful for your reflections and ideas.